The key ideas

A Conflict of Visions

Thomas Sowell, 1987

Why do the same people end up on opposite sides again and again, whether the argument is about taxes, crime or war? Thomas Sowell shows that behind it stand two old visions of human beings: one sees them as limited, the other as capable of perfection. You will learn how these visions understand knowledge, equality, power and justice in different ways, and you will learn to hear what any argument is really about.

Who it is for

For anyone tired of arguments where each side thinks the other is a fool. And for anyone who wants to understand what political views rest on, their own and other people's, without slogans and without parties.

There are no solutions. There are only trade-offs.

The same faces on opposite sides

Look at any big public argument: about taxes, crime, the army or schools. These are completely different questions, and logically they have nothing to do with each other. But Thomas Sowell noticed something strange. On opposite sides of each of them, again and again, stand the same people. It is as if each camp held one key that opens all these doors at once. And they argue as passionately as if the subject were not a budget but something far more personal.

Sowell is an American economist, and his academic home is the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. In 1987 he published a book that goes looking for that key. His answer: it is not that opponents are stupid, and not only that they have interests. Beneath the arguments lie two visions of the world, two different senses of how it works and of what a human being is.

The first Sowell calls the constrained vision: human beings are imperfect, and that cannot be fixed, so the best we can do is arrange life sensibly around their weaknesses. The second is the unconstrained vision: human beings can become far better if conditions change and reason is given its way. From this one fork grow different answers to questions about knowledge, equality, power and justice.

Sowell does not tell you whom to vote for. His task is a different one: to show what both sides stand on. After this book you will be able to hear what really lies behind someone else's argument, and behind your own as well.

The argument starts before the first point is made

Before anyone builds a theory, they already see the world in some way. The economist Joseph Schumpeter had a name for this: the pre-analytic cognitive act. Sowell takes this thought as his starting point and calls such a picture a vision. A vision is a sense of how everything fits together, what follows from what, and why. It comes before reasoning and tells us which facts to treat as important.

Sowell compares visions to foundations. Theories are built on them and then tested against facts. But hardly anyone tests the foundation itself: it just feels like common sense.

We cannot do without visions. The world is too complex to work out from scratch every time, and nobody has time to learn all the facts before acting. A vision works like a map: it helps you through the confusion, but like any map it leaves things out.

One subtle point matters here: a vision is not the same as values. Two sides can value freedom, justice and the welfare of the poor equally. Where they part ways is over what actually leads there. This is an argument about causes and effects, not about who is kinder.

This points to a mistake the book helps you avoid. If the other person has reached a different conclusion, the easiest thing is to decide they are stupid or dishonest. More often they simply stand on a different foundation. Until that foundation is named, the argument misses its mark.

Read in Livria

About the author

Thomas Sowell is an American economist and writer, for many years a fellow of the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. He is the author of dozens of books on economics, history and society.

All books by this author: Thomas Sowell

Terms from the book

  • Smith
  • Jefferson
  • Hamilton
  • Marx
  • Malthus
  • Godwin
  • Vision
  • Pinker
  • Hoover Institution: A research centre for economics, politics and history at Stanford University in California. Sowell has been a fellow there since 1980.
  • Schumpeter: Joseph Schumpeter (1883–1950), an Austrian and American economist, author of a theory of economic development and of the idea of creative destruction.
  • Pre-analytic cognitive act: Schumpeter's phrase: an intuitive picture of a subject that arises before any analysis and then guides it.
  • Burke: Edmund Burke (1729–1797), an Irish-born British politician and thinker, author of Reflections on the Revolution in France.
  • Hayek: Friedrich Hayek (1899–1992), an Austrian-British economist and philosopher, winner of the 1974 Nobel Prize in Economics.
  • Condorcet: The Marquis de Condorcet (1743–1794), a French mathematician and philosopher of the Enlightenment who believed in the endless progress of human reason.
  • Rousseau: Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778), a philosopher from Geneva, author of The Social Contract.
  • Paine: Thomas Paine (1737–1809), a pamphleteer, author of Common Sense. He supported both the American and the French revolutions.
  • Constrained vision: Sowell's concept: a picture of the world in which human nature is imperfect and unchanging, so society rests on trade-offs, rules and processes tested by time.
  • Unconstrained vision: Sowell's concept: a picture of the world in which human beings can be perfected, and social evils can be removed by reason and the right institutions.
  • Federalist: The Federalist, a collection of 85 essays from 1787–1788 in defence of the US Constitution. Its authors were Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay.
  • Social justice: The idea that not only the actions of individuals but the distribution of goods across a whole society can be just or unjust.
  • Rule of law: The principle that laws are known in advance, the same for everyone, and binding on citizens and government alike.

All terms

Similar books