The key ideas

The Scout Mindset: Why Some People See Things Clearly and Others Don't

Julia Galef, 2021

The French General Staff convicted an innocent officer, and only one colonel dared to ask: what if we are wrong? Julia Galef explains why we defend comfortable beliefs like soldiers, and how to learn to look at the world like a scout. This book is about seeing clearly without losing your motivation or your hope.

Who it is for

For anyone who wants to make decisions with a clear head, argue without going to war and admit mistakes without shame. And for anyone who suspects they sometimes believe what is comfortable rather than what is true.

If you find out you were wrong about something, great: your map just got more accurate, and that can only help you.

A Note from the Wastebasket

Paris, 1894. A cleaning woman at the German embassy pulls a torn-up note out of a wastebasket and hands it to French intelligence. Someone among the French officers is selling military secrets to the Germans. Suspicion quickly falls on Captain Alfred Dreyfus, the only Jewish officer on the General Staff. There is almost no evidence, but even that is turned against him: it must mean he is good at covering his tracks. Dreyfus is convicted and sent into exile for life.

Some time later, Colonel Georges Picquart takes over counterintelligence. He doesn't much like Dreyfus and has no doubt he is guilty. But then he comes across letters written by Major Esterhazy, and the handwriting is the same as on the note. Picquart asks a question nobody on the General Staff had asked: what if we are wrong? His inquiry will cost him a posting to Tunisia, and later a prison cell. Dreyfus will not be fully cleared until 1906.

Julia Galef, an American writer who brings rational thinking to a wide audience, opens her book with this story. She describes two ways of thinking. Soldier mindset defends the position it has already taken and fights off inconvenient facts. Scout mindset wants to see the terrain as it really is and draw the most accurate map it can.

The main idea of the book: an accurate picture of the world is more useful than it seems, and a comforting illusion costs more than it seems. Galef is not asking you to turn into a cold machine. She shows how to notice the soldier in yourself, how to measure your own confidence and how to live without fooling yourself and still keep your motivation and your friends.

“Can I Believe This?”

The psychologist Tom Gilovich noticed that we ask facts different questions. When we want something to be true, we ask: “Can I believe this?” And we look for just one reason to say yes. When we don't want it to be true, we ask: “Must I believe this?” And we look for just one way out. Bending conclusions to fit what you want has a name: motivated reasoning. This is soldier mindset.

Galef doesn't think the soldier is a fool. As she lays it out, he is guarding very real things. Some of them are emotional: comfort, self-esteem, morale. Others are social: the ability to persuade, making a good impression and the feeling that you belong.

The trouble is that we strike this deal with ourselves without noticing. The benefit of self-deception arrives right away, and the bill comes later. In Galef's view, we overestimate how useful our illusions are and underestimate what the habit of seeing clearly is worth. On top of that, one comfortable untruth drags others after it, to keep the picture whole.

Imagine Anna, whose boss hands her report back for the second time. The easiest thing is to decide he is just nitpicking. That is comforting. But then the third report will come back for the same reason, and Anna will never find out what that reason is.

Read in Livria

About the author

Julia Galef is an American writer who brings rational thinking to a wide audience. She co-founded the Center for Applied Rationality and for many years hosted the podcast Rationally Speaking.

All books by this author: Julia Galef

The Scout Mindset: Why Some People See Things Clearly and Others Don't Quiz

Terms from the book

  • Obama
  • Intel
  • Amazon
  • Dawkins
  • Grove
  • calibration
  • Expected value
  • Taylor
  • Gilovich
  • Status quo
  • Identity
  • Tetlock
  • Bezos
  • Musk
  • SpaceX
  • Dreyfus: Alfred Dreyfus, a captain in the French army. In 1894 he was falsely convicted of spying for Germany, and he was fully cleared only in 1906.
  • Picquart: Georges Picquart, a French officer and head of counterintelligence. He found proof that Dreyfus was innocent and pushed for the case to be reopened, even though he suffered for it himself.
  • Esterhazy: Ferdinand Esterhazy, a major in the French army. His handwriting matched the handwriting on the note that got Dreyfus convicted.
  • Soldier mindset: An image from the book, not a scientific term: the habit of defending a position you already hold and fighting off inconvenient facts.
  • Scout mindset: The central image of the book: the wish to see things as they are, not as you would like them to be. The author's own term.
  • Motivated reasoning: A concept from psychology: bending your conclusions to fit what you want to believe, not to fit the facts.
  • Conformity: The tendency to bend your opinions and behaviour to match the people around you. The conformity test in the book checks whether an opinion still stands without their support.
  • Double standard test: A technique from the book: check whether you would judge an action the same way if someone from the other side had done it.
  • Selective skeptic test: A technique from the book: ask yourself whether the same evidence would convince you if it pointed against your position.
  • Outsider test: A technique from the book: imagine what someone from outside would do, someone not tied to your past decisions.
  • Spock: A character from the science fiction series Star Trek, an alien who prides himself on pure logic.
  • Equivalent bet test: A technique from the book: compare a bet on your own opinion with a bet whose odds you know, to find out how sure you really are.
  • Callahan: Steven Callahan, an American sailor. In 1982, after his boat sank, he spent 76 days on an inflatable raft in the Atlantic and wrote about it in his book Adrift.
  • Golgi apparatus: A structure inside the cell that sorts and packages proteins. For a long time its existence was disputed.
  • Superforecasters: People who, over years of forecasting tournaments, predicted events noticeably better than everyone else. They were studied by Philip Tetlock.
  • Brookshire: Bethany Brookshire, an American science journalist. She publicly admitted that the conclusion of her popular post was wrong.
  • Cato Institute: An American think tank that argues for as little government involvement in the economy as possible.
  • Litterman: Bob Litterman, an American financier who spent many years managing risk.
  • Caplan: Bryan Caplan, an American economist. He came up with the ideological Turing test.
  • Ideological Turing test: A check proposed by Bryan Caplan: explain the other side's position so well that its supporters cannot tell you from one of their own. The name refers to Alan Turing's test, in which a machine has to pass for a human.

All terms

Similar books