Livria

Book quiz

Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise Quiz

Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise, Anders Ericsson, Robert PoolPeak: Secrets from the New Science of ExpertiseAnders Ericsson, Robert Pool

An ordinary student learned to repeat eighty-two digits in sequence after two hundred hours, although his memory apparently had not changed. Anders Ericsson, whose research underlies the ten-thousand-hour rule, explains what actually happens when someone becomes an expert. And why he himself disputed that rule.

Question 1 of 5

According to the researchers, why could Steve Faloon repeat eighty-two digits?

Show the answer

Right answer: He packed the digits into meaningful chunks

Steve's short-term memory capacity barely changed. What changed was the structure: groups of digits became race times for him, meaningful chunks.

Question 2 of 5

According to the authors, what makes the brain and body rewire themselves?

Show the answer

Right answer: Sustained effort beyond what you're used to

The brain and body change when the load pushes past what's comfortable for a long time. Calmly repeating what you already do well brings no such change.

Question 3 of 5

You've written work emails for years but they aren't getting better. What is missing, per the authors?

Show the answer

Right answer: A goal and feedback on where the text is unclear

An automatic action is only maintained by repetition. Growth comes from purposeful practice: a small goal, attention, feedback and a bit of extra difficulty.

Question 4 of 5

What happened to chess masters' advantage when the pieces were placed at random?

Show the answer

Right answer: Their advantage almost disappeared

A master sees not separate pieces but familiar patterns and links, that is, mental representations. A random setup offers nothing to recognize.

Question 5 of 5

What is Ericsson's criticism of the ten-thousand-hour rule?

Show the answer

Right answer: There is no threshold, and not all time doing it is practice

Ten thousand hours is the average of the best violinists, not a mastery threshold. And Gladwell, in Ericsson's view, did not separate deliberate practice from any time spent on the activity.

Want all of the book's key ideas? Read or listen to its retelling in Livria.